info ElectricFence-2.2.2-alt3.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libefence.so but just /usr/lib64/libefence.so.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libefence.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libefence.so to \%files of ElectricFence-2.2.2-alt3.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info alsa-oss-1.1.6-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so but just /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so to \%files of alsa-oss-1.1.6-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libaoss.so but just /usr/lib64/libaoss.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libaoss.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libaoss.so to \%files of alsa-oss-1.1.6-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info ananas-0.9.5-alt11.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libananas.so but just /usr/lib64/libananas.so.1.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libananas.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libananas.so to \%files of ananas-0.9.5-alt11.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info aufs2-util-2.2-alt0.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so but just /usr/lib64/libau.so.2.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libau.so to \%files of aufs2-util-2.2-alt0.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info aufs2-util-ng-2.1-alt2.git0f0cf3f.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so but just /usr/lib64/libau.so.2.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libau.so to \%files of aufs2-util-ng-2.1-alt2.git0f0cf3f.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info aufs3-util-3.0-alt0.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so but just /usr/lib64/libau.so.2.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libau.so to \%files of aufs3-util-3.0-alt0.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so but just /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so to \%files of capstone-4.0.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info ceph-base-14.2.22-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so but just /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so to \%files of ceph-base-14.2.22-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so but just /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so to \%files of ceph-base-14.2.22-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info cgreen-1.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so but just /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so to \%files of cgreen-1.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info codeblocks-contrib-20.03-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so but just /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so.0.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so to \%files of codeblocks-contrib-20.03-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libccom.so but just /usr/lib64/libccom.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libccom.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libccom.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libced.so but just /usr/lib64/libced.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libced.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libced.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so but just /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcfio.so but just /usr/lib64/libcfio.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcfio.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcfio.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcimage.so but just /usr/lib64/libcimage.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcimage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcimage.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcline.so but just /usr/lib64/libcline.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcline.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcline.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcpage.so but just /usr/lib64/libcpage.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcpage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcpage.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so but just /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcstr.so but just /usr/lib64/libcstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libctb32.so but just /usr/lib64/libctb32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libctb32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libctb32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so but just /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libdif32.so but just /usr/lib64/libdif32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libdif32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libdif32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libevn32.so but just /usr/lib64/libevn32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libevn32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libevn32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libexc.so but just /usr/lib64/libexc.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libexc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libexc.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libfon32.so but just /usr/lib64/libfon32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libfon32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libfon32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libleo32.so but just /usr/lib64/libleo32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libleo32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libleo32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblns32.so but just /usr/lib64/liblns32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblns32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblns32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libloc32.so but just /usr/lib64/libloc32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libloc32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libloc32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so but just /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so but just /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpass2.so but just /usr/lib64/libpass2.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpass2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpass2.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr3532.so but just /usr/lib64/libr3532.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr3532.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr3532.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librbal.so but just /usr/lib64/librbal.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librbal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librbal.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librblock.so but just /usr/lib64/librblock.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librblock.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librblock.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so but just /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librcutp.so but just /usr/lib64/librcutp.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librcutp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librcutp.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librdib.so but just /usr/lib64/librdib.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librdib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librdib.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so but just /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librimage.so but just /usr/lib64/librimage.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librimage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librimage.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librline.so but just /usr/lib64/librline.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librline.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librline.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librling.so but just /usr/lib64/librling.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librling.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librling.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librlings.so but just /usr/lib64/librlings.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librlings.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librlings.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librmarker.so but just /usr/lib64/librmarker.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librmarker.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librmarker.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librneg.so but just /usr/lib64/librneg.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librneg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librneg.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librout.so but just /usr/lib64/librout.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librout.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librout.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librpic.so but just /usr/lib64/librpic.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librpic.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librpic.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librpstr.so but just /usr/lib64/librpstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librpstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librpstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librreccom.so but just /usr/lib64/librreccom.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librreccom.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librreccom.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librsadd.so but just /usr/lib64/librsadd.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librsadd.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librsadd.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librselstr.so but just /usr/lib64/librselstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librselstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librselstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so but just /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librstr.so but just /usr/lib64/librstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librstuff.so but just /usr/lib64/librstuff.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librstuff.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librstuff.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librverline.so but just /usr/lib64/librverline.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librverline.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librverline.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so but just /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstd32.so but just /usr/lib64/libstd32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstd32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstd32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info dante-1.4.2-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsocks.so but just /usr/lib64/libsocks.so.0.1.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsocks.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsocks.so to \%files of dante-1.4.2-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info dmd-2.091.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so but just /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so.0.91.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so to \%files of dmd-2.091.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.7.16-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libescpr.so but just /usr/lib64/libescpr.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libescpr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libescpr.so to \%files of epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.7.16-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info geany-plugins-1.35-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so but just /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so to \%files of geany-plugins-1.35-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info gettext-tools-0.20.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so but just /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so.0.5.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so to \%files of gettext-tools-0.20.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so.3.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so.3.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so.3.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so.2.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so but just /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so.17.0.3. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info hedgewars-0.9.25-alt2.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so to \%files of hedgewars-0.9.25-alt2.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so but just /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so to \%files of hedgewars-0.9.25-alt2.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info igt-gpu-tools-1.24-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libigt.so but just /usr/lib64/libigt.so.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libigt.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libigt.so to \%files of igt-gpu-tools-1.24-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info jpcap-0.7-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so but just /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so to \%files of jpcap-0.7-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info juffed-0.10-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjuff.so but just /usr/lib64/libjuff.so.0.10. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjuff.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjuff.so to \%files of juffed-0.10-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so but just /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so.0.10. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so to \%files of juffed-0.10-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info kicad-5.1.6-alt1.rc1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so but just /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so to \%files of kicad-5.1.6-alt1.rc1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info last.fm-1.5.1.31879-alt4.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so but just /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so to \%files of last.fm-1.5.1.31879-alt4.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libMoose.so but just /usr/lib64/libMoose.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libMoose.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libMoose.so to \%files of last.fm-1.5.1.31879-alt4.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info lftp-4.8.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so but just /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so to \%files of lftp-4.8.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so but just /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so to \%files of lftp-4.8.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libbcg729-1.0.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so but just /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so to \%files of libbcg729-1.0.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libcuda-550.67-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcuda.so but just /usr/lib64/libcuda.so.550.67. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcuda.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcuda.so to \%files of libcuda-550.67-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libdevmapper-event-1.02.173-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so but just /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so.2.03. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so to \%files of libdevmapper-event-1.02.173-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libgpac-1.0.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgpac.so but just /usr/lib64/libgpac.so.10.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgpac.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgpac.so to \%files of libgpac-1.0.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libguac-client-kubernetes-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-kubernetes.so but just /usr/lib64/libguac-client-kubernetes.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-kubernetes.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguac-client-kubernetes.so to \%files of libguac-client-kubernetes-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libguac-client-rdp-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-rdp.so but just /usr/lib64/libguac-client-rdp.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-rdp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguac-client-rdp.so to \%files of libguac-client-rdp-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libguac-client-ssh-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-ssh.so but just /usr/lib64/libguac-client-ssh.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-ssh.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguac-client-ssh.so to \%files of libguac-client-ssh-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libguac-client-telnet-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-telnet.so but just /usr/lib64/libguac-client-telnet.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-telnet.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguac-client-telnet.so to \%files of libguac-client-telnet-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libguac-client-vnc-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-vnc.so but just /usr/lib64/libguac-client-vnc.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguac-client-vnc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguac-client-vnc.so to \%files of libguac-client-vnc-1.3.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libjcpkcs11-2.7.4-alt5.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjcPKCS11-2.so but just /usr/lib64/libjcPKCS11-2.so.2.7.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjcPKCS11-2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjcPKCS11-2.so to \%files of libjcpkcs11-2.7.4-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libjemalloc-devel-5.1.0-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so but just /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so.2.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so to \%files of libjemalloc-devel-5.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libjsw-1.5.6-alt1.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjsw.so but just /usr/lib64/libjsw.so.1.5.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjsw.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjsw.so to \%files of libjsw-1.5.6-alt1.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so but just /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so to \%files of libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so but just /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so to \%files of libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so but just /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so to \%files of libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libnvcuvid-550.67-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so but just /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so.550.67. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so to \%files of libnvcuvid-550.67-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libnvidia-encode-550.67-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnvidia-encode.so but just /usr/lib64/libnvidia-encode.so.550.67. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnvidia-encode.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnvidia-encode.so to \%files of libnvidia-encode-550.67-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libnvidia-ml-550.67-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnvidia-ml.so but just /usr/lib64/libnvidia-ml.so.550.67. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnvidia-ml.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnvidia-ml.so to \%files of libnvidia-ml-550.67-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libpcsclite-1.9.5-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so but just /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so to \%files of libpcsclite-1.9.5-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libpcsclite-devel-1.9.5-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so but just /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so to \%files of libpcsclite-devel-1.9.5-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libpdflib-lite-7.0.5-alt1.p3.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpdf.so but just /usr/lib64/libpdf.so.6.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpdf.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpdf.so to \%files of libpdflib-lite-7.0.5-alt1.p3.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libpolyml-5.4.1-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so but just /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so.3.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so to \%files of libpolyml-5.4.1-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so but just /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so to \%files of libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so but just /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so to \%files of libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so but just /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so to \%files of libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libstlink-2018.04.18-alt2.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstlink.so but just /usr/lib64/libstlink.so.1.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstlink.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstlink.so to \%files of libstlink-2018.04.18-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libta-lib-0.4.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so but just /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so to \%files of libta-lib-0.4.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libtag-extras-1.0.1-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so but just /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so to \%files of libtag-extras-1.0.1-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libtranslit-icu-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so but just /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so to \%files of libtranslit-icu-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libtranslit-m17n-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so but just /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so to \%files of libtranslit-m17n-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libuniset2-extension-mysql-2.12.1-alt1.M90P.2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so but just /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so.2.12.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so to \%files of libuniset2-extension-mysql-2.12.1-alt1.M90P.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so but just /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so to \%files of libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so but just /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so to \%files of libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so but just /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so to \%files of libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libwlocate0-1.1-alt1_10.git20130127.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libwlocate.so but just /usr/lib64/libwlocate.so.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libwlocate.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libwlocate.so to \%files of libwlocate0-1.1-alt1_10.git20130127.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libxmlsec1-gcrypt-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-gcrypt-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libxmlsec1-gnutls-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-gnutls-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libxmlsec1-nss-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-nss-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info libxmlsec1-openssl-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-openssl-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info lldpd-1.0.8-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so but just /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so.4.9.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so to \%files of lldpd-1.0.8-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info midori-9.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so but just /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so.0.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so to \%files of midori-9.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so but just /usr/lib64/libmapi.so.9.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmapi.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so but just /usr/lib64/libstream.so.8.2.3. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstream.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so but just /usr/lib64/libbat.so.15.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbat.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so.23.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so to \%files of mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so to \%files of mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so to \%files of mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so to \%files of mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so to \%files of mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so to \%files of mono-core-6.12.0.206-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info mozldap-6.0.7-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libldap60.so but just /usr/lib64/libldap60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libldap60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libldap60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libldif60.so but just /usr/lib64/libldif60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libldif60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libldif60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so but just /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so but just /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info mumble-1.2.19-alt5.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmumble.so but just /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1.2.19. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmumble.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmumble.so to \%files of mumble-1.2.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info netxms-agent-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libappagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libappagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info netxms-client-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so to \%files of netxms-client-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so but just /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so.4.6.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so.5.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so but just /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info nextcloud-client-2.6.4-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so but just /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so.2.6.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so to \%files of nextcloud-client-2.6.4-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info nss_wrapper-1.1.11-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so.0.3.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so to \%files of nss_wrapper-1.1.11-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info openssl-engines-rutoken-1.4.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librtengine.so but just /usr/lib64/librtengine.so.1.4.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librtengine.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librtengine.so to \%files of openssl-engines-rutoken-1.4.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info pam_wrapper-1.1.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpam_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libpam_wrapper.so.0.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpam_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpam_wrapper.so to \%files of pam_wrapper-1.1.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info pmplib-0.14-alt0.1.qa2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpmp.so but just /usr/lib64/libpmp.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpmp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpmp.so to \%files of pmplib-0.14-alt0.1.qa2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info procbench-0.9.0a-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so but just /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so to \%files of procbench-0.9.0a-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info proxychains-3.1-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so but just /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so.3.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so to \%files of proxychains-3.1-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info qlcplus-5.0.0-alt1.alpha3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libqlcplusengine.so but just /usr/lib64/libqlcplusengine.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libqlcplusengine.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libqlcplusengine.so to \%files of qlcplus-5.0.0-alt1.alpha3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libqlcplusui.so but just /usr/lib64/libqlcplusui.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libqlcplusui.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libqlcplusui.so to \%files of qlcplus-5.0.0-alt1.alpha3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libqlcpluswebaccess.so but just /usr/lib64/libqlcpluswebaccess.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libqlcpluswebaccess.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libqlcpluswebaccess.so to \%files of qlcplus-5.0.0-alt1.alpha3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_config.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_config.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_config.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_config.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_core.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_core.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_core.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_core.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_io.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_io.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_io.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_io.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_main.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_main.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_main.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_main.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_search.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_search.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_search.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_search.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_util.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_util.so.3.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_util.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_util.so to \%files of radare2-3.5.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info resolv_wrapper-1.1.7-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libresolv_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libresolv_wrapper.so.0.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libresolv_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libresolv_wrapper.so to \%files of resolv_wrapper-1.1.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info samba-winbind-clients-4.14.10-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so but just /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so to \%files of samba-winbind-clients-4.14.10-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so but just /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so to \%files of samba-winbind-clients-4.14.10-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info smack-utils-1.3.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsmack.so but just /usr/lib64/libsmack.so.1.3.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsmack.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsmack.so to \%files of smack-utils-1.3.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info snoopy-2.4.6-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsnoopy.so but just /usr/lib64/libsnoopy.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsnoopy.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsnoopy.so to \%files of snoopy-2.4.6-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info socket_wrapper-1.3.3-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so.0.3.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so to \%files of socket_wrapper-1.3.3-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper_noop.so but just /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper_noop.so.0.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper_noop.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper_noop.so to \%files of socket_wrapper-1.3.3-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info subversion-javahl-1.14.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so but just /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so to \%files of subversion-javahl-1.14.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libttspico.so but just /usr/lib64/libttspico.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libttspico.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libttspico.so to \%files of svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info thrift-devel-0.10.0-alt6_15jpp8.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so but just /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so to \%files of thrift-devel-0.10.0-alt6_15jpp8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so but just /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so to \%files of thrift-devel-0.10.0-alt6_15jpp8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info thrift-glib-0.10.0-alt6_15jpp8.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so but just /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so to \%files of thrift-glib-0.10.0-alt6_15jpp8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info tiled-1.4.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtiled.so but just /usr/lib64/libtiled.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtiled.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtiled.so to \%files of tiled-1.4.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info tsocks-1.8-alt1.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so but just /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so.1.8. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so to \%files of tsocks-1.8-alt1.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info uid_wrapper-1.2.8-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so.0.0.9. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so to \%files of uid_wrapper-1.2.8-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info valentina-0.3.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so but just /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so.2.2.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so to \%files of valentina-0.3.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so but just /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so to \%files of valentina-0.3.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info verlihub-plugin-python-1.1-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugin-python-1.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so to \%files of verlihub-plugin-python-1.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt2.qa2.2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info verlihub-plugins-lua51-1.8.1-alt1.qa3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-lua51-1.8.1-alt1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; info xsp-4.4-alt5.S1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so but just /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so to \%files of xsp-4.4-alt5.S1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.;